It's hard not to get excited by Michelin stars as an American transplant to Europe, and never harder than when visiting Paris. Despite urban America's recent food revolution, France's storied eating temples and rising super-chefs alike occupy an almost inaccessible niche in our cultural mythology. Food writing has never helped to part the clouds over Michelin's dining Olympus; one blog seems dedicated to a personal reconstruction of the star ratings into grades A through F with all the pluses and minuses in between. Even an obvious powerhouse like
Tokyo gained a new Western gastronomic legitimacy when recently contextualized by Michelin. So no matter how many hype-worthy meals I've had elsewhere, my first visit to a Parisian three star is an exercise in impossibly high hopes.
That three star is L'Astrance. Any food obsessed traveler with a web browser will tell you that it's high on the list for innovation and quality in Paris right now. Also known for well orchestrated service more congenial than cool, it's an inviting entry point into the world of destination dining. This is almost a mythic journey for me, so I had better gird well. Tip number one for the wary neophyte: dress to kill. Or at least to spy. The more you look like a not-so-secret agent, the more naturally you'll field French menus, elitist neighbors, and appetite-killing prices.
I come cuffed and collared, but L'Astrance makes it easy. Other patrons run the range from casual cool to just casual, and most are speaking some flavor of accented, citizen-of-the-world English. The staff are more friendly than fierce, and clearly enjoy playing "guess the wine" with the customers. (Is this some kind of French fad? I like a blind tasting as much as the next guy, but after two separate occasions I'm wondering if this is
de rigueur when ordering by the course instead of the bottle.) Some have secret agent skills of their own; the timing and coordination are so good that often items appear and disappear without my slightest notice.

What I can't fail to notice is the food. I take the modest option that's sold as a three course surprise menu. It's actually more like eight if amuse, flanking desserts, and all the incidentals are tallied separately. The chef must be some kind of savant at sourcing since every piece of meat, fowl, fish, and fruit, every distinct ingredient, is incredibly fresh and flavorful. The seafood in particular is the best I've ever had. Lightly poached cockles actually taste, no joke, like an ocean breeze. Dishes are composed artfully, but not fussily, with an eye for color. A scallop with spring vegetables in a foamy Thai broth is spare and beautiful.
Muscat grapes are served as part of an unassuming but hard-hitting fruit course, and they're a revelation. Maybe all muscat are created equal, but these are the first I've tried and I instantly dust off my mental picture book of Roman film heroes being fed grape clusters by appreciative love interests.

Not everything is perfect, and at this level the misses suffer by comparison. A few courses need salt, including my main: beautifully cooked pieces of lamb served with a jarring paste of anise, coffee, and about seventeen mystery ingredients. It tastes like plum sauce on acid, but without the rich sweetness needed to harmonize with the lean and mild lamb.
L'Astrance isn't perfection, and maybe I'm a fool for hoping it would be. It does offer some incredible flavors and a level of decadence which represent significant additional value beyond less consummate restaurants close to its price range. And these are certainly lurking around (I'm talking about you,
Senderens). I'd like to believe in the Michelin myth, that if not perfection, at least I'll find an impassioned grasping after it when I see the three star stamp. L'Astrance doesn't disillusion me; can there really be any better praise?